nou: The word "kake" in a white monospaced font on a black background (Default)

This is going to be the last time (for now, at least) that I post about the books I’ve read. I need to decrease the number of small recurring tasks on my schedule, because they add up to a lot of time that I’d rather spend on larger tasks.

(Also, the below might seem super-negative, but that’s partly because I’ve recently been trying out lots of books I was dubious about in order to get them off my “I should see if I like this Kindle sample enough to buy the full thing” list.)

Definitely recommend

  • Nightingale Wood, Stella Gibbons. I wasn’t quite sure about putting this in “Definitely recommend” because I Really Do Not Like what the author did to Hetty, and the only gender-non-conforming character is a terrible person, but overall I think it’s well worth reading. And if you liked the dry humour of Cold Comfort Farm, you’ll find some of it here too.
  • The Clockwork Rocket, The Eternal Flame, and The Arrows Of Time, Greg Egan (all re-reads). After much disappointment with recent Greg Egan, I retreated to the classics. He is of course perfectly entitled to change his mind about the sort of books he likes writing, but I wish there had been someone else to take over from him when he stopped writing about universes with different fundamental laws, and what it means to be a person instantiated in different media, and how science works when people really care about it. These three also possibly shouldn’t be in “Definitely recommend” because they certainly include discussion of some very distressing things, and if you’re going to read them then you need to be prepared for (a) many diagrams and (b) physics that will likely in part go over your head. But it’s OK to skim the parts you don’t understand, and every time you re-read them you’ll understand more. (A hint: if you’re struggling to understand how something works in 1 time + 3 space dimensions, try visualising it in 1 time + 2 space.)

Maybe recommend

  • The Pleasant Profession of Robert A Heinlein, Farah Mendelson (DNF). This was well-researched and well-written; I'm just not interested enough in Heinlein to have kept reading.

Wouldn’t recommend

  • Paladin’s Grace, T Kingfisher (DNF). This was... OK I suppose. I wasn’t a fan of the “jealous man with violent thoughts” parts, and there was nothing about the story that made me want to keep reading.
  • The Long Earth, Terry Pratchett and Stephen Baxter (DNF). Gave up at 20% through because I wasn't finding it interesting.
  • Cold Magic, Kate Elliott (re-read, DNF). I think my main issue with this is the writing, which is focused so heavily on a particular style that it both gets in the way of comprehensibility and occasionally ties itself in knots that it never quite gets out of. I think I’ve previously read the whole trilogy? But this time I just couldn't face any more of those over-elaborate clauses.
  • Behind The Throne, K B Wagers (DNF). Again I thought the writing got in the way of itself — in this case there were just too many forced metaphors. Also I felt the book perhaps started in not quite the right place — there was a bit too much backstory exposition being squeezed in between the action.
  • Engineering Infinity, edited by Jonathan Strahan (DNF). A collection of short SF. I got halfway through and had either DNFed or not enjoyed every story so far, so stopped.
  • The Throne Of The Five Winds, S C Emmett (DNF). I didn't get past the second page of this, by which point I'd already encountered three footnotes, a misused semicolon, and descriptions of things the viewpoint character couldn’t possibly have seen. (To be clear, those weren’t the only reasons I stopped reading, but they didn’t exactly incline me to continue. I like footnotes but I feel they should provide extra, optional information, rather than worldbuilding that would be better placed in the actual story.)
  • At Bertram’s Hotel, Agatha Christie (re-read). There are things I like about this — the descriptions of the hotel and its procedures — but I don’t like the overall moral that the author wants to get across. This is hilarious though: “Miss Marple awoke early because she always woke early. [...] glanced at her clock, half-past seven”. Oh for the leisured life of the middle classes.
nou: The word "kake" in a white monospaced font on a black background (Default)

Definitely recommend

  • Laughing All The Way To The Mosque, Zarqa Nawaz (re-read). A memoir by the writer of Little Mosque on the Prairie, funny without being superficial.
  • Daughter of the Bear King, Eleanor Arnason. I love the protagonist's love for bathrooms! The writing is quite idiosyncratic in places, with lots of short choppy sentences (I recall complaining about this in another book, but somehow it works here). I like that the protagonist is a 40-something woman, and that the author explicitly set out to write a fantasy that wasn’t good vs. evil.
  • Swordheart, T Kingfisher (re-read). Yep, still like this, and it does bear re-reading. I'd forgotten that it was going to be a trilogy! Though there seems to be no news of the second one yet.
  • The Star Side Of Bird Hill, Naomi Jackson. Three generations of women in Barbados and Brooklyn (mainly Barbados). I liked this and will probably re-read it.
  • Swallow, Sefi Atta. The lives of a mother and daughter in rural and urban Nigeria. Some parts are a bit distressing, but overall it’s a positive story.
  • Smallbone Deceased, Michael Gilbert. I loved the dry humour in this, and had several actual LOL IRL moments.

Maybe recommend

  • Sixteen Ways To Defend A Walled City, K J Parker. I like the idea of this very much — a fantasy-like (albeit no-magic) setting with an engineering focus — but there are too many random sexist and homophobic parts, and although the author seems to be trying to address racism, he doesn't seem to have a very nuanced understanding of it.
  • Stoner, John Williams (DNF). I stopped about halfway through this because I just really disliked the viewpoint character. It’s fine to sleepwalk through your life if that’s what you want to do, but it’s not OK to mistreat other people along the way (e.g. he doesn’t seem to have considered that if he stopped raping his wife then maybe she’d be less depressed). The writing is good, though.
  • Shadows Of Athens, J M Alvey. A detective story set in Ancient Greece. I liked the inclusion of details like contraception and clothing, but I didn’t find it really drew me in.
  • Gone, Min Kym. This wasn't bad, though it did seem to contradict itself in places, and also I'm sceptical that the author can really remember so many details from when she was seven. I wished there had been more technical details, like the stuff about flying staccato and the modifications she made to her violins. (I also wish she'd left her manipulative boyfriend a hell of a lot earlier, but that’s for her benefit, not mine, and if she had done then there probably wouldn’t have been a book.)
  • Instantiation, Greg Egan. Not sure what I think of this collection. A couple of them stop instead of ending. I was amused to discover that he ended up doing two sequels to the one he wrote specifically to make fun of Adam Roberts.
  • Slow Bullets, Alastair Reynolds. This was OK, but it felt more like there were six people on that ship than 600. Also the villain was very one-dimensionally villainous.

Wouldn’t recommend

  • Monday Begins On Saturday, Boris and Arkady Strugatsky (DNF). Got 37% of the way through and there'd only been two or three brief parts I actually found interesting, and it felt like it was taking a very very long time to get anywhere, so I stopped.
  • Fall, Or Dodge In Hell, Neal Stephenson (DNF). This started out pretty interesting, with some nice noodling about how consciousness works and so on (though quite a lack of clue about how social media works), but about 20% of the way through it cut to a near-future where regressively-Christian parts of the USA are referred to as “Ameristan”, and that just bugged me so much I had to stop.
  • Annex (DNF). Post-alien-invasion story with a teenage trans protagonist. I’ve tried reading this a few times now, but it just doesn't feel plausible to me either in terms of the worldbuilding or the tone of the children’s POV.
  • Children Of The Star, Sylvia Engdahl. There's a lot of rather unpleasant ideas in here: individual genius saves the world, subjugating the masses for the good of the masses, a genetic basis for intelligence, disgust at intellectual disabilities. I also found it pretty tedious to read at times — it would have been better if it had been less long. (And a lot of it felt like the sort of job interview that Ask A Manager says you should not put up with.)
nou: The word "kake" in a white monospaced font on a black background (Default)

Definitely recommend

  • The Raven Tower, Ann Leckie (re-read). Yes. I still like this. I will probably re-read it again.
  • The Palace Of Illusions, Chitra Divakaruni (re-read). I liked this the first time I read it — a woman-focused retelling of the Mahabharata — and I liked it even more this time, possibly because remembering some of the names and plot from last time made it easier to follow. And it manages to have a climactic battle scene that I didn’t find tedious! (See below.)

Maybe recommend

  • The Once And Future King, T H White. This is a strange book which feels very much of its time, i.e. the 1950s. It has hardly any women in, and one of the minor characters is super-racist. Approximately 0.1% of it is hilarious (the dispensary for sick armour! Uncle Dap's fury over the “horrible furrows” of over-ornate armour design!), and every so often there's an interlude of interesting technical stuff about jousting or diving or something like that. But also there are huge long boring rambly sidetracks, and everyone in the story is terrible except King Pellinore, Elaine, and possibly Sir Ector and Gawaine. (King Pellinore is adorable, and I wish to imagine that part of the reason he loves that feather bed so much is that Sir Grummore sneaks into it every night.)
  • Master Of The Five Magics, Lyndon Hardy (re-read). It's not impeccably well written, and I'm sure I remember it being more hard-fantasy than this, and there's a tedious battle scene at the end (I find almost all battle scenes tedious, though see above). But I do like the new afterword.
  • The Summer We Got Free, Mia McKenzie (DNF). Judging by the Kindle sample it seems to be about a dark family tragedy, and that’s not something I’m keen on. It seemed well-written and interesting aside from that, though.
  • The Lark, E Nesbit. I find the ignorance of class privilege in books like this is a little wearisome, and reading about people who're anxious about being caught in a lie makes me anxious too. But the latter part didn’t go on too long, and overall I didn’t regret reading it.

Wouldn’t recommend

  • Dignity, Chris Arnade. This just felt a bit pointless and repetitive.
  • The Ten Thousand Doors Of January, Alix E Harrow (DNF). I didn't even get to the end of the Kindle sample on this one. From what I did read, it seemed like it was going to be extremely clumsy about race and colonialism, and also that it was going to be one of those stories where only one woman gets to be both alive and a fully realised character.

Written by friends

  • Favours Exchanged, L A Hall.
  • Mistress In Her Household, L A Hall.
nou: The word "kake" in a white monospaced font on a black background (Default)

Definitely recommend

  • At The Mouth Of The River Of Bees, Kij Johnson. I don't really get along with most short story collections any more — I think partly because they're not hugely conducive to being picked up and put down again at short notice. I didn't have that problem with these. (I skipped “Ponies” because I've read it before and knew it would be upsetting, and I didn’t get on with “Story Kit” because that sort of experimentation doesn’t really do it for me.)

Maybe recommend

  • Garnethill, Denise Mina (re-read). It’s not perfect, but it’s a decent read, albeit somewhat distressing in places. Also the twist was explicitly given away partway through, and I’m not entirely sure that was on purpose.
  • Touch, Claire North. I do like the idea behind this, but there's a bit too much commentary on minor things the narrator can't possibly know (restaurateur waving goodnight to his favourite customers) and some rather shoehorned metaphors (old men with holes in their cardigans, trains shrieking "like a metal mother-in-law"). And it all has a feel of having been written by someone who really doesn't like women very much.
  • Without You There Is No Us, Suki Kim. A memoir of time spent teaching at a college in North Korea. The writing is sometimes a little unclear, particularly when describing physical things like buildings and mountains. And there were perfectly plausible things that the author seemed to think were quite outlandish, like free medical care, free higher education, and the idea that international adoption might not be an unalloyed good. Her failure to explain social security to the students did not feel to me like a failure of the students. There was her ignorance of the fact that not all Americans can use as much electricity as they want or need, and her sneering at CNN Asia reporting on sexual abuse in American college sport. Basically I thought it was noteworthy that she never interrogated her own (extreme in its own way) capitalistic viewpoint.
  • The Poppy War, R F Kuang (DNF). There were several things I liked about this, but fundamentally it’s a war story with a side order of abusive schooling, and neither of those is my thing.
  • The Man Who Knew Too Much, G K Chesterton. Linked short stories. The mysteries are clever, and the writing is so good, but the characters are super-racist!
  • Minor Mage, T Kingfisher. The author insists that this is a children’s book, but I actually found part of it verging on too scary for me.

Wouldn’t recommend

  • Promised Land, Connie Willis and Cynthia Felice (DNF). Apparently this is an SF classic? It really hasn't aged well.
  • Into Everywhere, Paul McAuley (DNF). Got 5% of the way into this and it just felt like it was going to be exhausting, so I stopped.

Written by friends

  • Two Weddings & Several Revelations, L A Hall.
nou: The word "kake" in a white monospaced font on a black background (Default)

I decided to have a month of re-reads, which I mostly stuck to except for also reading the recently-released sequel of one of my re-reads.

Definitely recommend

  • An Accident of Stars and A Tyranny of Queens, Foz Meadows (re-reads). Realistic portal fantasy. These can be a bit heavy-handed in their right-on-ness and Lessons In How To Not Make Neurodivergent People Feel Uncomfortable, but there's a good story and some good writing and some complex characters and I'll likely re-read them again.
  • The Steerswoman, The Outskirter’s Secret, The Lost Steersman, and The Language of Power, Rosemary Kirstein (re-reads). These are so good! They’re very cleverly written, but in a way that makes me feel the author is doing her absolute best to give me a puzzle I’ll enjoy, rather than showing off how clever she is. Knowing the overall answer to the puzzle doesn’t spoil enjoyment of the gradual reveal, and indeed there’s no one point where you “should” get it — different people will get it at different points, and it honestly doesn’t matter when you figure it out. There will eventually be more in this series, and I’m really looking forward to them.
  • Fangirl, Rainbow Rowell (re-read). A very sweet story about a fanfic author in college, with plenty of friend/family relationships as well as romantic ones.

Maybe recommend

  • Carry On (re-read) and Wayward Son (sequel), Rainbow Rowell. I enjoyed Carry On the first time I read it, but found it less interesting to read while knowing what happens. It’s also very obvious that it was written by an American despite being set in the UK. I do like the multiple viewpoints though. I feel as if I should have liked Wayward Son, but somehow I never found it particularly absorbing. There’s nothing actually wrong with it; maybe it just suffered from association with my disappointing experience with Carry On.
nou: The word "kake" in a white monospaced font on a black background (Default)

Definitely recommend

  • Cold Comfort Farm, Stella Gibbons (re-read). I love this book so much and have read it at least a dozen times. I will probably read it a dozen more times. If you find deadpan gentle parody absolutely hilarious then you’ll probably love it too.
  • Winterglass, Benjanun Sriduangkaew. An interesting choice to end the book before the end of the story, though I believe there’s now going to be a sequel? I liked the gender diversity, but the pronouns did get a bit muddled up sometimes.
  • China Court, Rumer Godden. Impeccably structured and written, but with totally unnecessary-to-plot domestic violence and sexual coercion at the end. I'll likely read this again and just stop before I get to that scene. Well worth reading for the structure, pacing, and use of tenses — the ending is such a shame though.

Maybe recommend

  • The Yellow Houses, Stella Gibbons. I thought I should read more Gibbons since apparently she was absolutely sick of people loving Cold Comfort Farm and ignoring her other work. Possibly this wasn’t the right one to start with, since it wasn’t published in her lifetime. It was OK, though I didn't see the point of the Japanese parts, and I kept worrying that the mysterious strangers would turn out to be malicious, so I couldn’t relax and enjoy the parts where people were being nice to each other.
  • The Breakfast Book, Andrew Dalby. A literary review of breakfasts. It did have a few oddly inaccurate parts — to a baker, “crust and crumb” are parts of the loaf, not anything with “negative implications”, and Earl Grey tea is not flavoured with jasmine. So I wouldn't rely on it as a source of evidenced facts, but it's a good source of inspiration for further research (and, indeed, for breakfast).
  • Pachinko, Min Jin Lee. The background about Koreans in Japan was interesting, and perhaps the best part of the book for me. I didn’t particularly love any of the characters, and I wished there had been more supportive relationships between women.
  • Island of Ghosts, Gillian Bradshaw. Historical fiction following a Sarmatian brought to Roman Britain. I liked how there was still backstory being revealed almost right up to the end, and I also liked the focus on non-romantic relationships. But I’m not sure there was enough here to unreservedly recommend it, and not sure it’d keep my interest on a re-read either.

Wouldn’t recommend

  • The Prince, Niccolò Machiavelli translated by W K Marriott (DNF). This is a very old-fashioned translation, and I did not get on with its awkward phrasings and back-to-front sentences.

Written by friends

  • The Grave-Digger’s Boy, R R Newman. A “cold case” crime story written by a beer/pub historian.
  • Balmy Nectar, Ray Bailey and Jessica Boak. A collection of short pieces on beer and pubs. (NB Ray Bailey and R R Newman are the same person.)
nou: The word "kake" in a white monospaced font on a black background (Default)

I have a new policy for these book posts — from now on I’m going to have a completely separate section for books written by friends/acquaintances. It just feels a bit weird making judgments on them in public. (Even though everything so far, including this month, has been either “Definitely recommend” or “Definitely recommend if you’ve read the previous ones in the series”.)

Definitely recommend

  • The Stars Are Legion, Kameron Hurley. Quite gory in places, and I did occasionally wonder if it was going to breach my (very low) “too much horror” threshold, but it never actually did. I wasn’t surprised to see a copyeditor thanked in the acknowledgments — the whole of the text was just beautifully finished, with no rough edges getting in the way of the story.

Maybe recommend

  • Earthseed, Pamela Sargent (re-read). I read this when I was a kid, and decided to re-read it as part of working out which of my paper books to keep and which to send to the charity shop (to make room for other books). I’d either forgotten or not realised it was YA, which isn’t really my thing now. I remember enjoying it when I was younger though. (Also, I started this in February and only finished it in August. I’m not very good at remembering to finish reading paper books.)
  • Binti (re-read), Binti: Home (re-read), and Binti: The Night Masquerade, Nnedi Okorafor. The way mathematics is used in these novellas bothered me the first time I read them, but this time round I just accepted that the word in the Binti universe doesn’t mean the same thing it does in the real one. Mathematics in Binti isn’t a matter of creatively and rigorously working out the properties of abstract structures; it’s a sort of meditation based on mental repetition of integers and simple formulae. But I don’t understand why their smartphones astrolabes don’t have backups! In any case, I’m unlikely to re-read these. They’re fine for what they are, just not something I feel drawn back to.
  • To Be Taught, If Fortunate, Becky Chambers. I don’t like the implication that long nails are hideous and make your fingers useless, nor the assertion that that your average academic does nothing other than “teach the past”. I liked the framing whereby the narrator explained things from their time (which is in our future) “in case they’ve become obsolete” — a good way to get around infodumping. But why don’t disabled people get to go into the astronaut gardens? I find this author’s books a little frustrating since they’re overall very close to things I really want to read, but they all have aspects that somewhat spoil it for me.
  • Flowers At Dawn, Singai Ma Elangkannan translated by A R Venkatachalapathy. There’s a lot to like about this! It’s set among Tamils in Singapore during the Second World War, and it talks about food (including being creative about it during shortages) which is always a bonus, and the author really gets you to care about the main characters. But I could have done without the storyline of a man aggressively and damagingly pursuing a woman who’s not interested.

Wouldn’t recommend

  • 84K, Claire North (DNF). DNF mainly because of the really annoying fragmented sentence thing that made it unnecessarily hard to follow what was going on and who was saying what. It’s set in a dystopia, and it struck me as somewhat unrealistic that people were still allowed to pay for things with cash.
  • Utopia Five, A E Currie. That’s not how games work; you don’t just set up a world and put people in it without designing an actual game. Also I don’t think defibrillators work like that. And it seems really implausible that a world where a climate change incident had killed billions of people would really decide to organise its future around storing and processing massive amounts of data, like electricity generation doesn’t have a carbon cost. The idea that ubiquitous security cameras can entirely prevent crime seems very strange, and if they don’t have crime, why do they have prisons? (I didn’t appreciate the prison rape joke either.) I wished there had been some exploration of the negative effects of universal surveillance, and some acknowledgement that not everyone is happy to release the data they produce into the public domain for companies to profit from.
  • Let My People Go Surfing, Yvon Chouinard (DNF). Captures the “women aren’t people” vibe of On The Road surprisingly well. Also I love how Naomi Klein used her introduction to plug not one but two of her own books. I got 20% of the way through, disliking the author/narrator more for every page I ploughed through, and gave up after he asserted that his company “needed to blur that distinction between work and play and family”.
  • Gulliver’s Travels, Jonathan Swift. People went to university at 14! I’d forgotten that this is where “big-endian” comes from. The author is obsessed with poo, the narrator is a massive sycophantic grump, and sentences should not contain 137 words.

Written by friends

  • Incalculable Diffusion, L A Hall. The latest in the series.
nou: The word "kake" in a white monospaced font on a black background (Default)

Definitely recommend

  • Under The Pendulum Sun, Jeannette Ng (re-read). [personal profile] naraht asked for opinions about a book bundle including this, which reminded me that I’d been thinking of giving it another go. The first time I read it, I was under the mistaken belief that there was going to be a sequel, which may have been part of why it seemed incomplete. This time, knowing it was standalone, I didn’t have that problem, but I did feel that knowing the plot twists in advance took away a lot of its power. So I’m bumping up my recommendation for anyone who’s not read it from “maybe recommend” to “definitely recommend” (but not as a re-read).
  • A Matter Of Oaths, Helen S Wright (re-read). It’s interesting thinking about this in relation to Under The Pendulum Sun, since actually this has so many more potential hooks for sequels to hang from — not just an interesting universe to tell further stories in, but actual questions unanswered in the text — yet it did feel complete in itself. The cast of principal characters is very male-dominated, but that felt OK, at least partly because of the good queer representation.
  • The Song Of Achilles, Madeline Miller. I wish I’d read this before The Silence Of The Girls, because having read the latter I can see the gaps where The Song Of Achilles basically skips over the trauma the Trojan war would have caused to women. But that’s not an unreasonable authorial choice given the viewpoint character, and it’s still very good.
  • The Jungle School, Butet Manurung translated by Anya Robertson and Ro King. Memoirs and reflections from an Indonesian educational activist who worked with several Orang Rimba ("people of the forest") communities in Sumatra. Pretty interesting, not exoticising, and both realistic and practical.

Maybe recommend

  • The Belles and The Everlasting Rose, Dhonielle Clayton (DNF the second one). These were fine, certainly a lot better than the absolutely terrible Only Ever Yours (which for some reason people seem to be comparing them to?), and the setting is a very imaginative one, but the plot is rather “this happened, then this, then this”, and I just lost interest around two-thirds of the way into the second book. It was well-written, and I thought the choice to do it all in present tense was well-handled, but it just wasn’t really for me.
  • Exhalation, Ted Chiang. I was actually a bit disappointed by this, even though I enjoy the author’s work, mainly because I’d read most of it before. Of the nine stories here, seven have been published previously and I’d already read six of them. I’m definitely glad to have the two new ones, but I’d been expecting more.

Wouldn’t recommend

  • Dissidence (re-read), Insurgence, and Emergence, Ken MacLeod. I tried to read the first of these at least twice before, and was determined to get further this time, since a few people whose opinions I rate have said they liked them. I not only got to the end this time, but also worked out that the reason they bug me is that things keep getting interrupted by fight scenes, and I hate fight scenes. It kind of felt like lots of things were happening but at the same time nothing was happening. Also it bugged me that I had to keep translating from "kiloseconds" to quarter-hours. I understand that robots who’ve never seen the solar system won’t think in terms of hours, but it’s weird to translate their 31st-century robot dialect into 21st-century English everywhere except when time is involved. (Oh, and I’m not massively keen on the way the author invented his own N-word so he could let his viewpoint Nazis say it.)
  • The Priory of the Orange Tree, Samantha Shannon (DNF). This one’s just not very well thought out — every few pages there’s a detail that seems reasonable on the surface but when you think about it, you realise it makes no sense. The characterisation and world-building are paper-thin — all facade and no depth. There are too many ill-fitting similes. And I can’t help mentally pronouncing the protagonist’s name as “Eid Durian”, which makes me want to have a durian party. I made it a third of the way through and wished I’d given up sooner.
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 19


.

View Answers

Hello Kake!
18 (94.7%)

I read this!
18 (94.7%)

I would totally come to a durian party
3 (15.8%)

nou: The word "kake" in a white monospaced font on a black background (Default)

Definitely recommend

  • The Silence of the Girls, Pat Barker. This was very good, if emotionally difficult at times, and I would recommend it with a warning for fatphobia (dear authors, please stop doing this, it doesn't make your books better). There's also a lot of violence and misogyny, but that's an in-universe thing rather than bigotry leaking in through the fourth wall.
  • Lent, Jo Walton. I didn’t find the first part of this particularly gripping, but because I trust Jo Walton I persisted, and I'm glad I did. I'm looking forward to re-reading it now I know what happens in the later parts. And I'm not saying the first part was boring, either — I don't know a lot about that period of history but I re-watched The Borgias last year and it was interesting to see another retelling of the events. It was kind of the opposite of Robert Graves’ King Jesus in a way — King Jesus gives real-world explanations for supernatural events, whereas Lent gives supernatural explanations for an individual’s real-world behaviour. The ending was... I won't say a let-down, since I thought the tone was just right — matter-of-fact rather than overly dramatic - but I did find it a bit underwhelming.

Maybe recommend

  • Efuru, Flora Nwapa (re-read, DNF). The dialogue is often very awkward and stilted, which is a problem when it’s the way that most of the story is developed. I liked this the first time I read it but didn’t finish it this time — perhaps I just wasn't in the right mood.
  • In The Last Analysis, The James Joyce Murder, and Poetic Justice, Amanda Cross. I didn't actually realise how long ago the first one of these was published (1964) until I googled to check — nothing felt dated to me except some stuff about telephones and the reference to someone as “colored” (though I suppose the uncritical acceptance of Freud as a "genius" also comes under this). I was a little baffled by the idea that the baseline for analysis is that you go every day — was that really a thing? The second one has a couple of shockingly homophobic passages, equating gay men with paedophiles so casually that at first I didn't quite twig what I'd just read. The third one seemed to be assuming a lot more background knowledge about American universities than I actually have, and I struggled to stay interested. Overall it looks like a good series, though, and I’ll continue with it.
  • Terra Nullius, Claire G Coleman. This kind of dragged a bit, and some of the writing and plotting felt a bit clumsy. There was a Very Obvious Twist, and I found myself quite grateful that the author didn't make me wait too long before revealing it.
  • The Calculating Stars, Mary Robinette Kowal. This was OK. I kept waiting for it to get interesting but it never really did. I'm unlikely to read the sequel.

Wouldn’t recommend

  • In Other Lands, Sarah Rees Brennan (DNF). The worldbuilding is paper-thin, the protagonist is unrealistically good at things, and the structure is non-existent. And the whole “portal fantasy with a genre-aware viewpoint character” has been done before and better. I also got a strong feeling that it was going to do that “bisexual man dumps a woman for a man who’s actually been the love of his life all along” thing, which I do not like. But if you're after some light reading that goes on for a very long time and doesn't tax your brain, you might find this useful.
  • How Not To Run A Club, Peter Hook. There's an interesting story buried in here, but it's constantly being interrupted by dry recitals of facts, none of which ever seem to be referenced again. The structure is also very confusing, with large passages told in the third person and set in italics for no obvious reason. Also, the thing about being off your face is that it makes meaningless chaotic events seem interesting, but this effect doesn’t carry over when you write them down in a book.
nou: The word "kake" in a white monospaced font on a black background (Default)

Another monthly book post! If it seems like I read less this month than in previous months, that’s because my exhaustion/breathing problems seem to finally be appropriately medicated, so I’ve been outside walking instead of inside reading.

Definitely recommend

The Just City, The Philosopher Kings, and Necessity, Jo Walton. An SF-flavoured fantasy exploration of what might happen if someone actually set up Plato’s republic. I tried to read the first one of these when it first came out, and just didn’t get it at all. I thought I’d give it another go, though, and managed to get into it properly this time, liking it enough that I read all three.

Maybe recommend

Witch, Cat, and Cobb, J K Pendragon. There's a good story in here, but it's all so rushed! Why is it so rushed? This should have been at least twice as long as it actually is, probably more like three times as long.

A Man of Independent Mind, L A Hall. A sweet and powerful exploration of finding love again after bereavement. As with The Ironmaster’s Tale last month, this is only in “Maybe” rather than “Definitely” because I’m not sure it makes sense if you haven’t read The Comfortable Courtesan (though this one does feel a little more as though it might work standalone).

Eleanor Oliphant Is Completely Fine, Gail Honeyman (re-read). I'm not quite sure what I think of this; the first time I read it I thought it was great, but on a second reading some of it does feel a little bit too slick. I wish the author had left out the fatphobia — I get that she wants to show the main character’s difficulty with social skills, but she seems to have managed to leave out racism and homophobia. I do like that she’s explicitly stated (in a newspaper interview, I think?) that it’s about platonic friendship rather than romance.

Cinnamon and Gunpowder, Eli Brown. A sort of combination of pirate adventure story, romance, and food porn. I wasn't hugely interested in the adventure story or romance, and wished there had been more about food, because what there was was pretty good.

Wouldn’t recommend

The Lion and the Crow, Eli Easton (DNF). This was mentioned in a Twitter thread where a friend was asking for novels with gay protagonists, so I thought I’d give it a go. I found it... kind of odd. It’s written very simplistically, with hardly any worldbuilding or characterisation, and the occasional details that are specified seem incongruent with the setting. I got about a quarter of the way through then gave up.

nou: The word "kake" in a white monospaced font on a black background (Default)

Another book post, rather more timely than the last one.

Definitely recommend

The Healers’ Road and The Healers’ Home, S E Robertson. Low-tech low-violence fantasy with a sprinkling of magic. I enjoyed the first one but wasn't sure whether to read the second until I saw a review (spoilery for the first one) talking about how it starts quite slowly with the protagonists repeatedly wandering around town, choosing furniture and buying food, and then I knew it was a book for me.

Slow River, Nicola Griffith. A near-future sort-of noir, sort-of thriller, sort-of romance with excellent queer representation and an interesting exploration of future sewage technology. (One of the reasons I liked this was the same reason I liked the potato book — it gives details of ways of solving technical problems instead of handwaving it all away. But far from the only reason.)

Maybe recommend

The Woman Who Fooled The World, Beau Donelly and Nick Toscano. This was... OK, I guess? It kept me vaguely entertained while I was reading it, but it hasn’t stuck with me, possibly because it’s a story I’ve heard lots of times before (both with this particular woman and with others).

The Binding, Bridget Collins. This was kind of annoying, in that the premise was known to everyone except the protagonist for no apparent reason except to add mystery and suspense to the first few chapters. And then there was the gratuitous infanticide. Ugh and also the whole thing about being chosen. Also I'm fed up of m/m romances that work out well for the protagonists at the expense of a woman. But if you can overlook all that, then it’s quite a good read!

The Compleet Molesworth, Geoffrey Willans and Ronald Searle. A klassick of eng. lit. hem-hem. (Though full of casual racism etc.)

The Ironmaster's Tale, L A Hall. This would be in “Definitely recommend” except that if you haven’t read The Comfortable Courtesan it won’t make sense (please read The Comfortable Courtesan and then mentally move this to the top category). I love seeing retellings of previous stories through other characters’ eyes and with extra detail of their activities and thoughts, and that’s just what this is.

Perihelion Summer, Greg Egan. I love Greg Egan’s earlier work but found this kind of meh. Even a kind-of-meh Egan is a decent read though.

Wouldn’t recommend

The Slynx, Tatyana Tolstaya translated by Jamey Gambrell. DNF. Bit too stream-of-consciousness for me, and the style got in the way of working out what the story was about. This might have been the fault of the translator — it did feel a bit clumsily translated.

Artemis, Andy Weir. Second novel by the author of the potato book. There was all this sort-of fake diversity, where characters are described as being Saudi or Vietnamese or whatever, but speak and act exactly like early-21st-century Americans (a contrast to his stereotypical ja-saying German of the previous book). Also, their law-enforcement system is terrifying. DNF, partly because I lost interest in the plot and partly because I lost patience with the clumsy characterisation.

A Big Ship At The Edge Of The Universe, Alex White. Generic future-fantasy with magic crowbarred in. DNF.

Rien's Rebellion, C Z Edwards. Confusing and somewhat exhausting to read, and too many storylines left hanging. I realise it's the first in a series, but that doesn't mean it should just stop in the middle of everything.

Foundryside, Robert Jackson Bennett. This felt quite clumsy: the made-up swearwords (I love made-up swearwords, but these were so clumsily motivated that every time a character used one it annoyed me enough to pull me out of the story), the shoehorned-in exposition, the plot contradictions (literally in the space of two pages, a conversation went from “I tried to kill you, come to return the favour?” to “Ha, yes, of course I can't kill you because your mum would be annoyed”). Also, the default gendering of a sentient object to “he” really bugged me. DNF.

nou: The word "kake" in a white monospaced font on a black background (Default)

As discussed last month, I’m redirecting the energy I previously used for providing content warnings into writing a little bit about what I thought about the books.

(This isn’t why this post is late. There was minor Medical Drama involving unexpectedly low iron levels and some rather unpleasant tests to try to find out why — short version is my internal organs are fine, we still don’t know where all my iron went, but iron tablets are magic, and that’s good enough for me.)

Definitely recommend

Swordheart, T Kingfisher. I somehow wasn't expecting this to be a romance. But it is! As well as fantasy. I’d read it again.

The True Queen, Zen Cho. I loved the first book in this series (The Sorcerer to the Crown) and I love this one even more. Dragons! Powerful older women! Wit and banter that are actually funny! And other reasons to love it that would be SPOILERS.

The Martian, Andy Weir (re-read). I keep confusing [personal profile] bob by referring to this as “the potato book”, but honestly the POTATOES are the thing I love about it. There’s at least one potato reference that made me laugh out loud simply because of its precision and dryness (which may or may not have been intended by the author). Some of the book is a bit clumsy (the stereotypical German, the insistence that humanity never leaves anyone behind when it’s set in the near-future with no indication that the problems of poverty, famine, institutional racism, etc have been fixed) but overall I like it and may well read it again.

Maybe recommend

The Murder Of Roger Ackroyd, Agatha Christie (re-read). Hercule Poirot mystery with an unreliable narrator. I'd read this before many years ago so knew the twist, but enjoyed trying to figure out where the gaps in the story were and how it was all managed. The thing with Agatha Christie is that you can be reading along quite smoothly and then suddenly there's half a sentence of casual and entirely unnecessary racism, anti-semitism, ablism, etc, and then it goes back to being an interesting detective story. (Some of her books are worse than this, with the racism or rape-apologism embedded in the plot — I will never read Nemesis again.)

Clockwork Boys and The Wonder Engine, T Kingfisher (re-read). I decided to read these again after enjoying Swordheart, as they’re all set in the same universe and although I didn’t enjoy these two all that much the first time round, many other people seem to have loved them so I thought I’d give them another go. Still not my favourite: too much sexual longing, plot very slow. There are individual lines that are hilarious, though.

The King Must Die, Mary Renault (re-read). I read this when I was a kid and was absolutely astonished by it. It's still very readable, but although I'm aware of how pioneering it was in terms of retelling the Greek classics, I much prefer the more recent and less male-oriented works like Circe.

Wouldn’t recommend

The Valley At The Centre Of The World, Mallachy Tallack (DNF). This was just kind of boring. Also, there were too many short, choppy sentences that kept pushing me out of the story. I tried to work out if there was some pattern to these, some reason for them, but either there wasn't or it was too subtle for me. I got 27% of the way through and kept finding myself wishing I was reading something else, so I stopped.

The Invisible Library, Genevieve Cogman (DNF). This was kind of the opposite of The Valley in that it's all action and very little scenery. I again got fed up of it around the 27% mark and stopped reading.

Hot Money, Dick Francis (DNF). Not enough horses, too many unpleasant rich people. I stopped reading at the point where one of the main characters stated that a disabled person would have been better off dead.

Infomocracy, Malka Older (DNF). It's the future! Everyone has Wikipedia installed on their Google Glasses, police push their way through crowds by poking people with plastic triangles, and global elections are conducted with wards of exactly 100,000 people each. I decided not to buy this after reading the Kindle sample, so I don't know if the author ever explains what happens when someone dies or reaches voting age.

City Of Lies, Sam Hawke (DNF). I tried really hard to finish this! I should have liked it! It describes food and plants and technology, and has disabled protagonists! But I found it very boring and a little sanctimonious, and I kept forgetting which of the two POV protagonists was the current one, since aside from their disabilities and jobs they were fairly indistinguishable.

The Shipping News, Annie Proulx (re-read) (DNF). I read this years ago and remember liking it, so I thought I'd give it a re-read, but unfortunately I've also seen the film so was unable to get Kevin Spacey out of my head.

Flying Finish, Dick Francis. I appreciate that he included reproductive justice activists, but also hormonal contraception doesn't work like that. I liked all the detail about how you transport horses by air. But generally this isn't great. Too much about the perils of communism.

A Is For Alibi, Sue Grafton. This book is really weird about people's bodies, especially fat bodies. Aside from that, it's a fairly generic detective story with added tedious heterosexualling.

nou: The word "kake" in a white monospaced font on a black background (Default)

As previously, by default I’m just stating whether I’d recommend the book (yes/maybe/no), whether I decided not to finish it (DNF), whether it’s a re-read, and whether I can remember there being any content that needs to be warned for (cw).

I’m wondering though whether it would be better (as in, more interesting to those of you reading this, and more likely to inspire comments) if I stopped doing the content warnings and instead wrote a sentence or two about what I thought about the book. (I don’t have the energy to do both.) What do you think?

Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 31


I think...

View Answers

Yes — write opinions instead of content warnings
13 (41.9%)

No — stick with the content warnings
9 (29.0%)

I have a more complicated opinion which I will state in a comment
1 (3.2%)

I have no opinion that I wish to express on this matter
3 (9.7%)

Hello Kake!
21 (67.7%)

I like ticking boxes
18 (58.1%)

I hate ticking boxes
1 (3.2%)

I'm going to tell you to do whatever you want even though you're asking in order to gather data and a response such as this adds no useful data
8 (25.8%)

Definitely recommend:

  • Ann Leckie, The Raven Tower (cw: suicide, murder)

Maybe recommend:

  • Once Upon A River, Diane Setterfield (DNF) (cw: suicide)
  • The Breath Of The Sun, Rachel Fellman (cw: miscarriage, descriptions of dead bodies, reanimated dead bodies)
  • The Rig, Roger Levy (DNF)
  • The Overstory, Richard Powers (DNF) (cw: domestic violence)
  • Shades Of Grey, Jasper fforde
  • Murder At The Vicarage, The Body In The Library, The Moving Finger, A Murder Is Announced, They Do It With Mirrors, A Pocket Full Of Rye, 4:50 From Paddington, A Caribbean Mystery, At Bertram’s Hotel (all re-reads) (cw: racism, classism, ablism, homophobia, fatphobia, murder)
  • The Edge, Dick Francis (cw: suicide, animal death/mutilation, violence)
  • To The Hilt, Dick Francis (cw: violence, kink-shaming)

Wouldn’t recommend:

  • The Synapse Sequence, Daniel Godfrey (DNF) (cw: vomiting)
  • Origamy, Rachel Armstrong (DNF)
  • Icefall, Stephanie Gunn (DNF)
  • The Seven Deaths of Evelyn Hardcastle (cw: “really intense fatphobia that the author definitely agrees with”, child death, murder, violence, torture, rape, suicide)
  • Concrete Faery, Elizabeth Priest (cw: cultural appropriation, dubious consent)
nou: The word "kake" in a white monospaced font on a black background (Default)

As per usual, by default I’m just stating whether I’d recommend the book (yes/maybe/no), whether I decided not to finish it (DNF), whether it’s a re-read, and whether I can remember there being any content that needs to be warned for (cw). I’m happy to expand on the reasons for my opinions if anyone is interested though — just comment and ask.

Definitely recommend:

  • The Steerswoman, The Outskirter’s Secret, The Lost Steersman, and The Language of Power, Rosemary Kirstein (cw: violence, torture, violent death, xenophobia)
  • The Second Mango, Climbing the Date Palm, A Harvest of Ripe Figs, The Olive Conspiracy, and Tales From Perach, Shira Glassman (all re-reads) (cw: incest jokes, homophobia)

Maybe recommend:

  • The Magicians, The Magician King, and The Magician’s Land, Lev Grossman (all re-reads) (cw: violence, murder, rape, fatphobia, weirdness around queerness that doesn't quite reach the level of homophobia, mental illness oneupmanship, suicidal thoughts, amputation)
  • The Freeze-Frame Revolution, Peter Watts (cw: mass murder, solitary life imprisonment)
  • The Expert System's Brother, Adrian Tchaikovsky (cw: body horror, starvation, murder)

Wouldn’t recommend:

  • Iain M Banks, Paul Kincaid
  • Buying Time, E M Brown (cw: black woman killed to provide character development for white woman, women killed to provide character development for man, homophobia used as set dressing, fatphobia, women are fungible, creepy men in their 50s in love with teenage women)
nou: The word "kake" in a white monospaced font on a black background (Default)

As per usual, by default I’m just stating whether I’d recommend the book (yes/maybe/no), whether I decided not to finish it (DNF), whether it’s a re-read, and whether I can remember there being any content that needs to be warned for (cw). I’m happy to expand on the reasons for my opinions if anyone is interested though — just comment and ask.

Definitely recommend:

  • The Comfortable Courtesan, volumes 1–12, L A Hall (re-read) (cw: racism, racial slurs, anti-semitism, colonialism, rape, violence, murder, animal death, forced institutionalisation, miscarriage, child death)

Maybe recommend:

  • The City Of Brass, S A Chakraborty (cw: slavery, torture, racism, genocide, violence, possession, mutilation)
  • Convenience Store Woman, Sayaka Murata (cw: misogyny, ablism, emotional abuse)
  • Rickshaw Boy, Lao She translated by Howard Goldblatt (cw: coercion to drink alcohol, implied rape, misogyny, child death)
  • The Stopping Places: A Journey Through Gipsy Britain, Damian Le Bas (cw: racism, racial slurs)

Wouldn’t recommend:

  • After The Party, Cressida Connolly (cw: anti-semitism, POV fascists, fascist apologism, animal death)
  • Just One Damned Thing After Another, Jodi Taylor (cw: violence, voyeurism, animal death, pointless heterosexual drama)
  • Mr Fox, Helen Oyeyemi (DNF) (cw: murder)
  • The Old Man And The Sea, Ernest Hemingway (cw: animal death)
  • Onyx & Ivory, Mindee Arnett (DNF)
  • Swordspoint, Ellen Kushner (DNF)

I also tried to read State Of Emergency by Jeremy Tiang (cw: child abuse), but by the time I got to the end of my sample it had become unavailable in the Kindle store! Maybe one day it will come back.

What have you recently read and enjoyed? (Feel free to point towards posts on your own journal.) Do you have any opinions (good or bad) on the books above?

nou: The word "kake" in a white monospaced font on a black background (Default)

As per usual, by default I’m just stating whether I’d recommend the book (yes/maybe/no), whether I decided not to finish it (DNF), whether it’s a re-read, and whether I can remember there being any content that needs to be warned for (cw). I’m happy to expand on the reasons for my opinions if anyone is interested though — just comment and ask.

Definitely recommend:

  • Word By Word, Kory Stamper (cw: racial slurs, ablist slurs)
  • Untouchable, Mulk Raj Anand (re-read) (cw: racism, casteism, racial slurs, colonialism)
  • The Emperor’s Soul, Brandon Sanderson (cw: race as destiny)
  • The Devil's Novice, Dead Man's Ransom, The Pilgrim of Hate, An Excellent Mystery, The Raven in the Foregate, The Rose Rent, The Hermit of Eyton Forest, The Confession of Brother Haluin, The Heretic's Apprentice, The Holy Thief, Brother Cadfael's Penance, Ellis Peters (all re-reads) (cw: child betrothal, approval of the Crusades, violence, murder, self-harm, slavery, fatphobia, ablism, ablist slurs)

Maybe recommend:

  • The Red Threads of Fortune (re-read), The Black Tides of Heaven (re-read), and The Descent of Monsters, J Y Yang (cw: child death, animal death, graphic descriptions of dead bodies)
  • Starlings, Jo Walton
  • Stuart: A Life Backwards, Alexander Masters (re-read) (cw: violence, self-harm, fatphobia, racial slurs, ablism, rape, child abuse)

Wouldn’t recommend:

  • When We Were Orphans, Kazuo Ishiguro (re-read) (cw: misogyny, racism, graphic descriptions of dead bodies)

What have you recently read and enjoyed? (Feel free to point towards posts on your own journal.) Do you have any opinions (good or bad) on the books above?

nou: The word "kake" in a white monospaced font on a black background (Default)

As per usual, by default I’m just stating whether I’d recommend the book (yes/maybe/no), whether I decided not to finish it (DNF), whether it’s a re-read, and whether I can remember there being any content that needs to be warned for (cw). I’m happy to expand on the reasons for my opinions if anyone is interested though — just comment and ask. This month’s selection was a bit more diverse than last month’s!

Definitely recommend:

  • Ammonite, Nicola Griffith

Maybe recommend:

  • Surrey Killing Fields, Croydon Natural History and Scientific Society (cw: animal death)
  • Pulchritude, Ana Mardoll (DNF) (cw: mild body horror)
  • The Odyssey, translated by Emily Wilson (DNF) (cw: slavery, rape, murder)
  • Deluxe, Dana Thomas (cw: racism, classism, child abuse, violence)
  • Gods, Monsters, and the Lucky Peach, Kelly Robson (cw: extreme body modification, murder) (extra warning: if you buy this on Kindle, when you get to the end it shows you an author page which includes a disturbing cover image from one of the author's other books)
  • The Wrong Stars, Tim Pratt (re-read)

Wouldn’t recommend:

  • Watchmaker of Filigree Street (cw: internalised misogyny, casual racism)
  • Empress of a Thousand Skies, Rhoda Belleza (DNF)
  • The Dreaming Stars, Tim Pratt (DNF)

What have you recently read and enjoyed? (Feel free to point towards posts on your own journal.) Do you have any opinions (good or bad) on the books above?

nou: The word "kake" in a white monospaced font on a black background (Default)

Having done a re-read of Katharine Kerr’s Daggerspell in August’s reading, I decided to re-read the entire series (15 books), which took up the whole of September. So last month’s booklist is:

Maybe recommend:

cw for some/all of the below (I can't remember exactly what was in which books): child abuse, paedophilia, violence, incest, slavery, possession, whorephobia, fatphobia, homophobia, rape, murder, everyone-evil-is-gay, torture.

  • Darkspell, Katharine Kerr
  • Dawnspell, Katharine Kerr
  • Dragonspell, Katharine Kerr
  • A Time of Exile, Katharine Kerr
  • A Time of Omens, Katharine Kerr
  • A Time of War, Katharine Kerr
  • A Time of Justice, Katharine Kerr
  • The Red Wyvern, Katharine Kerr
  • The Black Raven, Katharine Kerr
  • The Fire Dragon, Katharine Kerr
  • The Gold Falcon, Katharine Kerr
  • The Spirit Stone, Katharine Kerr
  • The Shadow Isle, Katharine Kerr
  • The Silver Mage, Katharine Kerr

My feelings about this series are complicated. I’ve read it from start to finish twice now. I love the premise, the complex plotting is handled very well, and I’m fond of several of the characters. But it’s clear that this world was built without the author thinking that queer, trans, or disabled people might want to see themselves in it, and I’m a bit fed up of that sort of thing. I would love to see a series with this sort of structure written by someone more diverse and intersectional in their thinking.

nou: The word "kake" in a white monospaced font on a black background (Default)

As per last month, by default I’m just stating whether I’d recommend the book (yes/maybe/no), whether I decided not to finish it (DNF), whether it’s a re-read, and whether I can remember there being any content that needs to be warned for (cw). I’m happy to expand on the reasons for my opinions if anyone is interested though — just comment and ask.

Recommend: Nothing for a “definitely recommend” this month!

Maybe recommend:

  • The Armor Of Light, Melissa Scott and Lisa A Barnett (possession, discussion of paedophilia)
  • Eat Up, Ruby Tandoh
  • All Systems Red, Martha Wells
  • So You Want To Talk About Race, Ijeoma Oluo (DNF)
  • Semiosis, Sue Burke (cw: violence, murder, rape)
  • Senlin Ascends, Josiah Bancroft (cw: murder, violence, slavery)
  • Nineteen Eighty Four, George Orwell (re-read) (cw: classism, racism, torture, slavery)
  • A Burglar's Guide to the City, Geoff Manaugh
  • Daggerspell, Katharine Kerr (cw: child abuse, violence, incest, slavery, possession, whorephobia, possibly femmephobia)

Wouldn’t recommend:

  • Free Food For Millionaires, Min Jin Lee (cw: dieting, domestic abuse including violence, sexual coercion, ablist slurs) (DNF)
  • Resistance, BR Sanders (DNF)
  • Unidentified Funny Objects 2, edited by Alex Shvartsman
  • The Boy Who Loved Too Much, Jennifer Latson (cw: ablism, own-voice-erasure, fatphobia, Simon Baron-Cohen)
  • New York 2140, Kim Stanley Robinson (DNF)

What have you recently read and enjoyed? (Feel free to point towards posts on your own journal.) Do you have any opinions (good or bad) on the books above?

nou: The word "kake" in a white monospaced font on a black background (Default)

As per last month, by default I’m just stating whether I’d recommend the book (yes/maybe/no), whether I decided not to finish it (DNF), whether it’s a re-read, and whether I can remember there being any content that needs to be warned for (cw). I’m happy to expand on the reasons for my opinions if anyone is interested though — just comment and ask.

Recommend:

  • Ariah, BR Sanders (cw: police brutality, internalized homophobia, racism, rape, incest, conscription)
  • Spinning Silver, Naomi Novik (cw: anti-semitism, violence)
  • Bad Blood, John Carreyrou
  • Circe, Madeline Miller (cw: rape, slavery, murder)

Maybe recommend:

  • The Last Place You Look (re-read) and What You Want To See, Kristen Lepionka (cw: imprisonment, rape, violence, alcoholism)
  • Lark Rise To Candleford, Flora Thompson (cw: bullying, child abuse, racism, blackface, ableism, domestic violence, racial slurs)
  • Under The Pendulum Sun, Jeannette Ng (cw: incest)
  • Record Of A Spaceborn Few, Becky Chambers

Wouldn’t recommend:

  • Ascension, Jacqueline Koyanagi (DNF)
  • Give It To Me, Ana Castillo (DNF)

What have you recently read and enjoyed? (Feel free to point towards posts on your own journal.) Do you have any opinions (good or bad) on the books above?