<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dw="https://www.dreamwidth.org">
  <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-06-07:402288</id>
  <title>Kake</title>
  <subtitle>Kake</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>Kake</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://nou.dreamwidth.org/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://nou.dreamwidth.org/data/atom"/>
  <updated>2014-09-14T08:08:54Z</updated>
  <dw:journal username="nou" type="personal"/>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-06-07:402288:54408</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://nou.dreamwidth.org/54408.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://nou.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=54408"/>
    <title>Invisible bike helmets</title>
    <published>2014-09-14T08:08:46Z</published>
    <updated>2014-09-14T08:08:54Z</updated>
    <category term="technology"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>11</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;I just found out that the &lt;a href="http://www.hovding.com/how_hovding_works/"&gt;Hövding invisible bike helmet&lt;/a&gt; has gone into production and is now for sale.  I saw a video about this idea a while back and thought it looked pretty interesting.  It's quite expensive — £300 — and also it uses electricity, so it's not obviously better than a conventional bike helmet.  I'm not a cyclist so I can't evaluate it further than that, but it's certainly interesting.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you're a cyclist reading this, I'd love to know what you think.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=nou&amp;ditemid=54408" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
